Month: September 2016

Art House Asshole : White Girl

You know how when you’re wanting to go to the movie theater and you look up all the films that are showing and there are alway at least three that you’ve never heard of, let alone have any interest in seeing? Well, good news! I’ve seen those movies. I spend most of my theater experiences in art house theaters watching those movies that you’ve never heard of and then never watch. Yeah, I’m that hipster asshole. My goal with this is to spread information out about these films, that way you can decide one of the following. “That actually sounds pretty cool! I want to see that now!” or “Man, I’m glad I decided to go see the new superhero movie!”. So without further ado, here is my article and review of White Girl.

This is the comedy of the year. I don’t care if it’s September and there are months where funnier or better comedy films could come out. Mel Brooks could release his magnum opus next week, and this would still be the funniest movie of the year. All of this because this film doesn’t want to be funny. This film wants to shock you with how dangerous and disgusting today’s youth culture is, but instead shocks you at how hilariously this film is misinformed.

White Girl follows a college freshman in New York who moves into a new neighborhood with her best friend and then falls into the drug scene of the outer limits of New York. But when her new drug dealer boyfriend gets arrested for possession, she fights to set him free! This film is ridiculous. The characters are both unlikable and stupid beyond belief. The acting is either fantastic or absolutely revolting, I honestly can’t tell. The big thing this film has going for it in terms of actual good filmmaking is that the cinematography isn’t atrocious. But let’s get into this because I literally can’t stop thinking about this film.

The main character is played by everyone’s least favorite part of Homeland, Morgan Saylor. I liked her in the beginning and toward the middle, but she just kept doing the same mistake over and over and over again that I really didn’t care about the character. You can tell that there was suppose to be this downward spiral of drugs and sex and abuse for her character. The only problem is that literally after becoming friends with the drug dealer next door, she light switches her behavior for the rest of the movie. Instead of a downward spiral, she just flipped over the railing and fell to the bottom in a matter of seconds. This makes me not really have any sympathy for the character later on in the film. I didn’t feel like she accidentally found herself in this horrible situation. If she hadn’t moved into this neighborhood, her character was so stupid that she probably would have accidentally stepped in front of bus thinking it was a big dog. The drugs didn’t mess up her life, her own lack of intelligence did.

The most likable and relatable character in this film is actually the drug dealer she befriends or dates. This might have something to do with the fact that he isn’t in the film all that much as he is in jail most of the film. But the glimpses we have of him show that he doesn’t want to be in this drug dealing world. He talks about getting out. You can tell in certain scenes that he is a good guy and in a bad situation. So why isn’t he the main character in this story? If we followed him I might actually care about the outcome. But instead we have bowling pin number three to follow instead. You might be able to argue that is the point. That this film is arguing something about racism and love or whatever. But based on what the writer/director had the characters do and act, I feel if that is in the film it was an accident.

Critics have been comparing this film to Kids by Larry Clark. I can see where this film might remind some of those aspects. I certainly could see those aspects as well. But the major difference is that in Kids there is this sense of knowing what they are doing is wrong. The kids are smart, they just made bad choices. You can understand where the characters are coming from. White Girl wants to be Kids, but doesn’t know why. White Girl wants to shock you, but doesn’t understand why the audience was shocked when Kids came out. Kids works because when the characters learn of their AIDS and how destroyed their lives are going to be now, the characters get it and act accordingly. The audience shares the thoughts and shock that the characters are feeling. White Girl talks down to the audience so much that it’s insulting. It makes the main character so stupid that whenever something happens there needs to be five additional minutes to explain what just happened. You don’t feel sorry for the characters in White Girl because it is so poorly written that despite Morgan Saylor doing the best acting I’ve seen her do, I have no sympathy for this character because I know this character doesn’t exist. There is no immersion when your main character is so poorly written that you know it would never happen in real life.

The only reason why this film isn’t a half star film is because of two reasons. One, the cinematography is actually kind of good. The color palette used throughout the film is nice and it does help the film in certain scenes. It’s nothing revolutionary, but anything that’s good is better than most in this film. The second reason is that half way through I just started watching it as a straight up comedy. The theater I saw this in was around half full and by the end of the film we were all belly laughing at the film. This isn’t what the filmmaker wanted, but this is the best reason to watch the film. Normally I will say that a film that tries to say something and fails is better than a film that doesn’t try to say anything at all. This film is the exception to that rule.

Do I recommend this film? God no. Never think I am recommend this film. Watch this film with your friends and laugh at how stupid this film is. You won’t be shocked like the director wants. But you probably haven’t seen anything like this, this year. A so bad it’s good type of film. The film is called White Girl because the main girl is white but also that a nickname for cocaine is “white girl”. That is where the subtlety ends in this film.

Fall 2016 Fantasy Movie League – Week 2 Recap

Welcome to the results of Week 2 in the Reel Nerds Podcast Fantasy Movie League! We’ve added two new competitors to the league with Tyler Perry’s A Medea Cineplex (Henry) and Detonatormonkey (Ryan formerly of Nerd Fap Podcast)!

It was a wild weekend with ColoRadJoe (Joe) obtaining the Perfect Cinema (which carries a $5 bonus) early on, but once ‘estimates’ were revised, Radley Cinemas (Brad) leapfrogged into the top spot. Unfortunately for him, ‘actuals’ eventually were decided and ColoRadJoe retook the lead by $261,759. Radley Cinemas still holds the season lead, but not by much.

PeterParker (Ryan) once again tried to counter-program the expected lineup and would be completely at the bottom of the league if not for Movies After Ass (Zach) who once again failed to pick a lineup.

Next week will be another week tricky predictions with Blair Witch being the obvious front-runner. Is there enough goodwill from the original left to attract audiences? Is it compelling enough to bring in new audiences? Stay tuned!

FML Fall Week 2

Reel Commentary: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (Ultimate Edition)

The Reel Nerds sit down with comics artist Zach Howard to watch the entire ultimate edition cut of Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice.

Art House Asshole : The Great Beauty

You know how when you’re wanting to go to the movie theater and you look up all the films that are showing and there are alway at least three that you’ve never heard of, let alone have any interest in seeing? Well, good news! I’ve seen those movies. I spend most of my theater experiences in art house theaters watching those movies that you’ve never heard of and then never watch. Yeah, I’m that hipster asshole. My goal with this is to spread information out about these films, that way you can decide one of the following. “That actually sounds pretty cool! I want to see that now!” or “Man, I’m glad I decided to go see the new superhero movie!”. So without further ado, here is my article and review of The Great Beauty.

If you remember correctly my list on the 2015 Filmsplosion, Youth directed by Paolo Sorrentino was my favorite film from 2015. Since that episode, I have seen more films from that year that are now in my top ten of 2015. But as of writing this article, Youth is still my number one film from 2015. So when I decided to watch this film, I had pretty high expectations. And I will tell you straight up right now, The Great Beauty might be one of my favorite films from 2013. Sorrention has blown me away again with this film. It might sound like I’m gushing this review, but that’s the overall of what this review is going to be like.

The Great Beauty follows an aged writer in Rome as he wanders through his twilight trying to find purpose. The film also follows his interactions with his fellow aged artists, his friends from his past, and younger people he decides to converse with. Very similar to Youth this is very much a talkie drama about aging and looking back on your life. The biggest complaint you will find about Youth is that it is too similar to The Great Beauty. Where I can certainly see that point of view, Michael Cain and Toni Servillo look pretty much identical in the film and have very similar characters, there are major differences. I think Youth is a far more pessimistic look at life and aging, whereas Servillo looks at life like one long joke with an unfunny punchline.

Toni Servillo plays Jep Gambardella, a man who knows everyone but has also disappointed everyone he has ever met. The film wouldn’t work if Servillo couldn’t deliver these lines with fantastic timing and charisma. Servillo’s character is just so light hearted that you feel like you know this person. After the first hour of the film, you look at him like every other character looks at him, the fun older guy who doesn’t talk much. He makes you laugh when you need to and he makes you think when it’s required. In the general sense, he’s what I would call the perfect protagonist. He is the lead and walks through the story, but at the same time he guides the audience with him and he has you experience certain things with him as well. All of this while never breaking the fourth wall. It all comes from his performance and the writing.

Speaking of the writing, the dialogue in this film is phenomenal. The story is pretty minimal, even more so than Youth, but where the film lacks in traditional story it makes up for in fantastic thought provoking dialogue. There are so many great moments in the film that convey sadness and loneliness so well. A lot of the film is a critique of art in general and how an artist creates their art, something that I know a lot of people won’t be able to relate. As an artist, it completely hit me hard, but understand that this aspect of the film might not click for you if you aren’t an artist or know much about the artistic process. The character interactions between Servillo’s character and the rest of the city, specifically the daughter of an old friend who is now a forty-year-old stripper, are both heartbreaking and heartwarming as time goes on. You learn to respect Jep in ways while also disagreeing with him on some of his stances. He feels like a friend, not someone you agree with but has the respect to understand why you don’t agree with him.

The film, much like Youth, is shot absolutely beautifully. The camera moves in a fluid fashion, making the film feel like a dream, but it never does it in a way where it’s distracting. When the camera moves you get a stream of conscience point of view of the world. You as the audience member feel as though you are walking through Rome and dancing at these parties. It is a master craft of cinematography, not in an every shot a painting kind of way but in a telling the story through camera movement kind of way.

I know I’ve been gushing on this film and obviously, I’m going to recommend it. Even though there are the aspects of the film that I don’t think will resonate with a non-artist audience member, the rest of the film is so well done that it will still make a fantastic film that you won’t regret watching. I decided to review this film today because if all goes according to schedule, I don’t expect to like the film I will be reviewing next week.

Filmsplosion 2006

The Reel Nerds travel back 10 years and list their favorite films of 2006.

Fall 2016 Fantasy Movie League – Week 1 Recap

Welcome, nerds, to the results of the first official week of our Reel Nerds Podcast fantasy movie league! We practiced over the summer movie season and now, for the next 14 weeks, we’re going to really find out who, in a landscape of less obvious blockbusters, which of us has what it takes to generate the most revenue for our theaters.

As you can see, Radley Cinemas (Brad) narrowly won this week, with Jason’s Farthouse Cineplex (Jason) taking second by an even slimmer margin. I swear, yesterday when I checked the results, ColoRadJoe (Joe) was in second, but I guess FML did some recalculating overnight and here we are. PeterParker (Ryan) really doubled down on “The Light Between Oceans” thinking it would be a sleeper hit like “Me Before You”? Doctor Acula’s Movie Funhouse (James) didn’t even update his sparse lineup from last week and still beat him.

At the very bottom is Movies After Ass (Zach) who has failed to play for several weeks now, so we can only assume he’s pursuing the Taco award.

FML Fall Week 1

Ep. 266: Don’t Stop, Breathin’

The Reel Nerds can’t keep it in any longer when they review Don’t Breathe.

Art House Asshole : A Bigger Splash

You know how when you’re wanting to go to the movie theater and you look up all the films that are showing and there are alway at least three that you’ve never heard of, let alone have any interest in seeing? Well, good news! I’ve seen those movies. I spend most of my theater experiences in art house theaters watching those movies that you’ve never heard of and then never watch. Yeah, I’m that hipster asshole. My goal with this is to spread information out about these films, that way you can decide one of the following. “That actually sounds pretty cool! I want to see that now!” or “Man, I’m glad I decided to go see the new superhero movie!”. So without further ado, here is my article and review of A Bigger Splash.

As a heads up, we missed the first week of this series last week. The reason for that was that I was moving into my new apartment in New York City. Because of this, I will be able to go see Art House films more regularly and have better access to films I normally wouldn’t be able to see. So look forward to more obscure cinema that is currently playing in theaters in the future of this article series.

Watching this film is like watching two mutual friends who don’t like each other slowly realize they have the hots for each other. It’s uncomfortable and kind of gross, but it’s also kind of beautiful. Is it beautiful enough to make you want to hang out with those two mutual friends while they bicker about what kind of furniture they are going to buy? Depends on how much you like your friends. And after thirty minutes of trying to figure out how to write the first paragraph of this film review, that is the best way I can describe this film. Let’s get into it.

A Bigger Splash is an English-Language, Italian-French erotic psychological drama. The film is directed by Luca Guadagnino, an Italian director and frequent collaborator of Tilda Swinton. Guadagnino and Swinton’s works together include The Protagonists, I Am Love and this film. The film also stars Ralph Fiennes, Matthias Schoenaerts, and Dakota Johnson. The film feels very much like a mixing pot of talent, but if the pot wasn’t smooth yet and was still really chunky.

First and foremost, we should talk about the acting in the film. This is probably what drew you to this film in the first place if you are debating on whether or not to see this film. The four leads in the film are phenomenal. A Bigger Splash follows four people as they vacation at one of their homes in Italy. Tilda Swinton plays a rock star who is post surgery and must remain fairly quiet. Matthias Schoenaerts is a documentary filmmaker and Swinton’s lover. Ralph Fiennes plays Swinton’s former agent/manager and friend. Finally, Dakota Johnson plays Fiennes’ newly discovered daughter whom he brings on the trip with him. Ralph Fiennes consistently impresses me with his acting, I want to say this is one of his best performances, but that isn’t saying much. Fiennes blends the line of his characters asshole like nature with his lovable nature so perfectly that he feels like an actual human being, something that isn’t common in film. Tilda Swinton’s character can’t talk for most of the film, but you honestly forget this in multiple scenes. Swinton conveys so much emotion with her face and body alone, to the point where dialogue for her character really isn’t needed. When she does talk, she does so in a whispery kind of voice and it is only when the character feels she needs to speak. It is a very impressive performance and one that few actresses could pull off. Matthias Schoenaerts is very quickly becoming one of my favorite actors. I discovered him back in 2012 in Jacques Audiard’s Rust and Bone, then fell in love with him again in last year’s Far from the Madding Crowd. To show you how much I believe in this actor, with him co-starring in a film with Ralph Fiennes and Tilda Swinton, he was who I was the most excited about. He completely knocks it out of the park once again as the most relatable character of the bunch. Dakota Johnson is more tricky than the rest. She is good. For a young actress like herself, she holds her own with these heavy hitters really well. However, toward the end of the film, I realized that she was supposed to symbolize something, and I have no idea what that is. We can get into that later, but understand that I don’t blame Johnson for this. A combination of the performers will get you in the seat, but if you have followed this film there is probably something else you are thinking. Don’t worry, we will talk about Ralph Fiennes penis later.

Sadly, the performances are the only fantastic parts of the film. The story and dialogue are pretty bland and have been told before and better. Part of the film revolves around the fact that Ralph Fiennes previously dated Tilda Swinton years ago and introduced Swinton to Schoenaerts. So a lot of the film revolves around jealousy. Which is fine, but you never really agree with Fiennes. The entire time Fiennes is trying to convince Swinton to come back to him, you don’t want her to but you also don’t really care enough about the characters to be conflicted if they do get back together. These types of stories can work absolutely beautifully. But when you do these types of stories you have to feel for both characters, not just have it be a complete one sided discussion. This film is a perfect example of the acting being far superior to the writing, but that also not ruining the performances. The writing overall is okay but is a weaker part of the film.

The biggest issue of the film is by far the editing. If you’ve seen Luc Besson’s Lucy then you know about those strange edits where the film cuts away and shows you a mouse getting caught in a trap or a gazelle being eaten by a lion. The same types of editing are in this film. They aren’t downplaying to the audience like Lucy, but they are brash and intrusive edits into the film. I feel as though these edits were done to convey a sense of tension, but I wasn’t feeling tense when watching the film, I just felt annoyed. Every time one of these edits happened, and they happened a lot, it would take me out of the film and make me feel less invested in the story because I had to get over how unnecessary of a decision it was to put that edit there. This is the same reason why I don’t blame Johnson for not getting the message of what her character was supposed to represent. Every time her character was on screen, I would often still be thinking about how stupid it was that there was a sudden jump cut to a lime that she was eating.

Let’s talk about what everyone is thinking about. Ralph Fiennes and Matthias Schoenaerts glorious genitalia. This film is notorious because of the explicit full frontal male nudity. There have been countless articles about this film surrounding the fact that both the male leads choose to do full frontal nudity and a discussion as to why male actors aren’t expected to do nudity, but female actresses are. I went into this film expecting Ralph Fiennes to start helicoptering but was shown something else. Yes, both Fiennes and Schoenaerts have full frontal male nudity. But I would say that they have as much as both their female co-stars. I’m not going to discuss why male actors aren’t expected to do nudity. That is a huge subject that I don’t think is necessary to this review. Whenever there was nudity in this film, it felt warranted. And at the end of the day, that is what is important in my mind when it comes to nudity in the film. Is the shot of his swinging genitals necessary? Is the shot of her bouncing breasts necessary? That is the question that you need to ask when you want to form an opinion on a nudity in the film. It doesn’t matter about gender. It matters about what is needed.

I struggle to recommend this film. It is certainly good. And I have no issue saying that. I wouldn’t recommend you rush out and see the film. As of writing this review, you can only get it online for fourteen dollars and I might wait until it is easier to get a hold of. If you wanted to see it, by all means go and see it. But if you were on the edge, maybe wait until it is easier to access or skip this one.

Scroll to top