Month: April 2017

Art House Asshole : Win It All

You know how when you’re wanting to go to the movie theater and you look up all the films that are showing and there are alway at least three that you’ve never heard of, let alone have any interest in seeing? Well, good news! I’ve seen those movies. I spend most of my theater experiences in art house theaters watching those movies that you’ve never heard of and then never watch. Yeah, I’m that hipster asshole. My goal with this is to spread information out about these films, that way you can decide one of the following. “That actually sounds pretty cool! I want to see that now!” or “Man, I’m glad I decided to go see the new superhero movie!”. So without further ado, here is my article and review of Win It All.

If you have ever talked to me about filmmakers that I can’t stand, the name Joe Swanberg would be the first for me to mention. I’m not going to dance around the subject matter and say some things about how it’s just my opinion and that there is some merit to his work. Joe Swanberg is the most revolting filmmaker I think I have ever found. His name is attached to some of the worst indie films I have ever seen and his presence in the film community genuinely makes me mad. Every other film he has made is consistently in the worst films made that year. And I genuinely only think he continues to make films because he is friends with C-List actors who agree to be in his bad films. Overall I am not a fan of Joe Swanberg and I walk into all of his films expecting to absolutely hate every minute of his work.

That being said I kind of liked Win It All. Which is honestly really shocking to me. Almost to the point where it took me a few days to watch it all the way through because I think it awoke something in me and has caused me to lose my mind. But yeah. Let’s talk about how I kind of liked Win It All.

I’m going to try to avoid talking about Swanberg’s other filmography in this review and try to keep it as strictly on this film as I can, but understand if I begin to sway. Win It All tell the story of Eddie, a recovering gambling addict who is given 20 thousand dollars in cash to look over while his old acquaintance is in prison. Then, as expected, he gambles it all away and needs to get the money back before the other guy gets out of prison. So it is kind of a standard gambling film. It follows all of the tropes you see in other, and frankly better, gambling addiction or gambling based films.

Where this film succeeds is in the fact that despite it being kind of stereotypical in terms of telling a gambling story, it gives a much lighter and happier tone. This can be viewed as both a positive and a negative. I have seen some critics say that it is the feel good addiction movie that some people were wanting. But at the same time I have to ask myself do we really need a feel good addiction film? Is that not damaging and taking away from the actual issue of addiction? And I will say that not all of the film is happy go lucky. But that is kind of also a problem. For pretty much the entire film, everything just kind of works out. There is never any tension. You just see this guy get is life together. So when the big conflict comes up and the scene where things are suppose to show the darker side of gambling addiction, you don’t feel anything. There was no tension to the scene because leading up to this point everything worked out so I had a feeling that everything was going to work out. And I’m not going to spoil the film, but you can probably guess that the film doesn’t end with him ruining his life.

Another point I would like to compliment the film on is the performance by Jake Johnson, who plays the main character. I’m not in the boat that a lot of people have saying that he is going to be the next big thing. It’s possible but I don’t see that level of potential in him. That being said, Johnson does give a very strong performance in the film. He does have a charming personality to him, and I would argue that he carries this entire film on his shoulders. Mainly because besides his performance, everything else is just okay. That being said the only time I was not a fan of his performance was, unfortunately the climax of the film, where I did not believe a single thing that he said or did. But I can ignore that as the rest of the performance is quite good.

Some people have called Joe Swanberg a modern day John Cassavetes, which is understandable, but also just plain wrong. Joe Swanberg has the enthusiasm and motivation to be this generations John Cassavetes, without any of the talent or merit. Every single Joe Swanberg film looks either uninspired, Happy Christmas and Drinking Buddies, or just straight garbage, Silver Bullets and 24 Exposures. The one exception to this rule being Digging For Fire, which is actually well shot despite the rest of the film being mediocre. This film, unfortunately also follows the same pattern. Win It All looks absolutely horrible. When I watched the trailer I wondered how something going to Netflix could look so bad, until I saw Swanberg’s name on it and it made more sense. It is really a bummer as if the cinematography was done better and there was less grain in every single shot and the framing actually added something to the film, this could be an actually fantastic film. But at the end, the cinematography is what brings this film down to being a standard Swanberg film.

Despite everything I have said, I do like this film, which is more than I can say for everything else in Joe Swanberg’s filmography. And even though I hate a lot of his work, I can’t really hate the man. I’ve watched a couple interviews with the guy and I have seen a keynote that he presented. And at the end of the day Joe Swanberg seems like a really great guy. He loves what he does, he loves making movies and he has a huge passion for filmmaking. And I deeply admire that. I just really wish his films were better. With that being said Win It All is a huge step in the right direction. To the point where I might walk into his next film a bit more optimistic. Because deep down I want him to succeed. Because who knows, maybe he is the next John Cassavetes.

Ep. 297: Fire of the Colossus

The Reel Nerds fight toxic masculinity when they review Colossal and Free Fire.

 

(7:20) Arthouse Asshole: Your Name.

(9:59) Brad Around Town

88 Drive In: Power Rangers / F8 of the Furious / Get Out

(10:48) Drafthouse Update

(12:12) Film on the Rocks schedule

Reel News

(15:53) Avatar sequel release dates announced

(16:51) Vin Diesel & The Rock squash their beef, Statham and Rock get a spinoff movie

(18:38) Scott Derrickson attached to Locke & Key series

(20:00) Martin Starr in Spider-Man

(20:18) More X-Files on the way

(20:56) James Gunn on-board for Guardians 3

(23:00) More X-Men movies on the way

New Releases

(23:14) La La Land, Underworld: Blood Wars + Ultimate Collection, The Girl with All the Gifts, Criterion Tampopo, Rumble Fish, Caltiki the Immortal Monster, From Hell it Came, Frightmare, The Screaming Skull, Man From LaMancha, Django Prepare A Coffin, Secret Life of Pets, The Marine 5: Battleground, The Other Hell

Watching

(29:15) Zach: MST3K The Return

(31:09) Brad: MST3K The Return

(32:38) James: MST3K The Return, Five Came Back, The Fate of the Furious, The Case for Christ, Fargo (TV)

(45:17) Brad: Actor Martinez

(48:44) Ryan: Sandy Wexler, Demented, The Girl on the Train

Review

(58:00) Colossal

(1:17:41) Free Fire

Art House Asshole : Your Name.

You know how when you’re wanting to go to the movie theater and you look up all the films that are showing and there are alway at least three that you’ve never heard of, let alone have any interest in seeing? Well, good news! I’ve seen those movies. I spend most of my theater experiences in art house theaters watching those movies that you’ve never heard of and then never watch. Yeah, I’m that hipster asshole. My goal with this is to spread information out about these films, that way you can decide one of the following. “That actually sounds pretty cool! I want to see that now!” or “Man, I’m glad I decided to go see the new superhero movie!”. So without further ado, here is my article and review of Your Name.

I’m going to review this in a specifically vague way. There have been mixed receptions regarding the marking for this film. Your Name. is the fourth highest grossing film in Japanese Cinema History, it is the 8th highest grossing traditionally animated film of all time, and it is the highest grossing Anime Film ever made. So clearly people like this film enough to pay to see it. From there Funimation decided to distribute the film, even releasing it in Los Angeles briefly for an Academy Award Nomination, which failed. Clearly, people believe in this film. I remember back in December reading how some people at Funimation wanted to make this film the generations Spirited Away. With all of this, why is it that almost no one outside the Anime world has ever heard of this film? That could partially be because of the Marketing. There have been absolutely no commercials or anything of the sort to inform the public of the release. I went into this film never seeing a trailer for the film. I really didn’t even know the plot of the film beyond the absolute basics. So some have argued that there should have been more marketing. That the film should be seen by more people because it is really good. But Funimation’s decision to not market the film is why the film is failing. That’s one argument. I disagree. Yes, people should see the film and more people should be aware of it. But the fact that I knew very little about the story, I think helped the overall experience.

Your Name. is an Anime film about two high school students from different parts of Japan. One, Taki, is a short-tempered boy from Tokyo, and the other, Mitsuha, lives a traditional lifestyle in a small town. Both are unhappy with their current lives and wish for something else. Then, without explanation, they begin to switch bodies with each other. One day Taki will wake up in Mitsuha’s body and vice versa, but some days everything is normal. Then hijinks ensues. And that is where I’m going to leave it. The story unfolds greatly from there, but I want to leave that up to you to find out what the rest is. The film goes from being a cute fun standard body swapping film, to an absolutely breathtaking story in a matter of seconds. And I think this is one of the best-written stories I’ve seen in a long time.

The animation in the film is absolutely gorgeous. It has a very normal Anime feel in regard to the bodies and faces of each character, nothing worth noting anyway. But the backgrounds and the environments are absolutely incredible. There are these sweeping shots of mountains and cityscapes that are all traditional animation and it is absolutely breathtaking. I have heard some say it is almost like it’s concept art. It’s almost like this is what they presented to the studio and said what they wanted it to look like. But where most films run out of money and have to dumb down the production, this film looks exactly like that. Everything about the environment is beautiful and it is an incredible experience to see it on the big screen.

My only complaint I would have is that the film is very “Anime”, there are essentially two music videos in the film that act almost as an opening for an Anime Television show. And how the characters interact with each other can often be “Japanese”. But I really don’t blame the film for this. I’ve seen people complain about this but personally, I don’t care. The film was made in Japan, of course, it’s going to be “Japanese” like. Toni Erdmann is very German and I don’t blame it for that. You can’t really blame a film for being what it is. Just be aware that if you hate Anime, then don’t want this very Anime film.

Overall I would highly recommend Your Name. I think it is one of the best-animated films I’ve seen in a long time. And if you are looking for a nice Anime fix, then this would probably be right up your alley. It is a very limited release right now, but if you have a chance to see it on the big screen, I highly recommend you do so. I don’t think you will regret it.

Ep. 296: The Fateful Eight

The Reel Nerds never turn their back on family when they review The Fate of the Furious.

Art House Asshole : The Void

You know how when you’re wanting to go to the movie theater and you look up all the films that are showing and there are alway at least three that you’ve never heard of, let alone have any interest in seeing? Well, good news! I’ve seen those movies. I spend most of my theater experiences in art house theaters watching those movies that you’ve never heard of and then never watch. Yeah, I’m that hipster asshole. My goal with this is to spread information out about these films, that way you can decide one of the following. “That actually sounds pretty cool! I want to see that now!” or “Man, I’m glad I decided to go see the new superhero movie!”. So without further ado, here is my article and review of The Void.

I’ve been meaning to review this film for awhile. In fact, I tried to review this before Filmsplosion 2016, thinking it might make it into the top ten films of the year. That was one reason as to why I was wanting to review it. It was also because it is a very highly rated. But the biggest reason as to why I reviewed this is because The Void, what some are calling one of the best horror films of 2016/2017 depending on how you determine your release calendar, was directed by the same guy who directed Father’s Day. That’s right, the film that has been heavily debated on the podcast and what I think has been called on the podcast as “one of the worst films I have ever seen”, is made by the same guy that made The Void. So let’s get started.

The Void is a horror film centering around the occult and the meaning of life and death. This is my pretentious way of explaining this film. Don’t let the title of my review series distract you from the fact that this film is the least “Art House” film I am pretty sure I have reviewed in this series. This is a very standard independent horror film. I described it to someone as a film that will do really well once it gets to on demand. This is a prime example of something that you will see recommended to you on Netflix at 2 am and think, “what the hell” and just pop it on. But that isn’t necessarily a bad thing.

The Void begins with a local sheriff of a small boring town bringing in a druggie to the hospital after finding him bloody on the road. I won’t spoil what happens after this, but understand that it gets disturbing really, REALLY fast. I have seen other critics describe this film as inescapable dread, linking this film to the feeling of no matter what you do, you can not escape misery. And I think that is pretty accurate.

The film is pretty unpredictable. Both in terms of the disturbing content as well as how it is written. I would say that this is one of the better-written horror films I’ve seen in a while. It’s not amazing by any means. But when you have so much garbage horror being made, it is always fun when something like this rises to the top and actually can hold my attention. I think a majority of the characters have a large amount of development and have their motivations very clearly laid out to the audience in a way that isn’t down your throat with exposition but also does tell you the information, in a pretty unique way as well. I wouldn’t say that the plot is overly complex or anything like that, but it does keep you guessing and have you wondering just what exactly is happening the entire film. To the point where at the end, there are a few things that I am still confused about. But at the same time, I feel like that is part of the magic of the film. I left the theater still in the dark, which is kind of what the characters felt at the end. So I guess that is one of those positive/negative things that I run into in this series a lot.

One thing that I would like to mention is how great the special effects of this film are. Almost everything in this film is practical monster effects, which is incredible. Not only is it incredible, it is also completely horrifying. The film has a very similar vibe to it that The Thing has. Not in terms of plot or anything like that, but in the practical effects and the horrifying nature to them. Every monster in this film is terrifying, the final monster in this film is something of nightmares. I would say that the first half of the film is pretty tame, with just members of the occult being the real bad guys and horror, which is pretty calm. But there is a certain point halfway through the film, where everything essentially explodes and the film becomes one of the most unnerving experiences I’ve had in a theater in a long time. And I absolutely loved it.

I would certainly recommend this film. If you are a horror kind of person, I would say check it out in theaters if you get the chance. It’s only showing in one theater in NYC right now, and I’m not sure how far it is going to expand. But like I said earlier, this is a film that will do well and find it’s home on the VOD market. When it comes to Netflix or Amazon Prime or whatever, I would definitely check it out. I don’t know if a hell exists. But if it does, it probably looks a little something like The Void.

Ep. 295: Style Points

The Reel Nerds plan to rob a bank and they’re Going in Style.

Art House Asshole : The Love Witch

You know how when you’re wanting to go to the movie theater and you look up all the films that are showing and there are alway at least three that you’ve never heard of, let alone have any interest in seeing? Well, good news! I’ve seen those movies. I spend most of my theater experiences in art house theaters watching those movies that you’ve never heard of and then never watch. Yeah, I’m that hipster asshole. My goal with this is to spread information out about these films, that way you can decide one of the following. “That actually sounds pretty cool! I want to see that now!” or “Man, I’m glad I decided to go see the new superhero movie!”. So without further ado, here is my article and review of The Love Witch.

I should preface this by saying that I am a gigantic fan of 1970s exploitation sex-based films, especially those with supernatural satanic elements to them. So this film is really tailor-made for me. Earlier this year on the podcast, Brad reviewed this film before I had a chance to see it. I will say that I liked this film much more than he did. But that also has my bias taken into account. So I wanted to get that out of the way before I move forward with this review.

Oh my god, I loved this film. It is a film that only a very small group of people will enjoy. And I bet that group of people doesn’t even get to be over two hundred total, but boy am I one of them. Before I start talking about what doesn’t work in this film, let’s get all the lovey-dovey stuff out of the way.

The Love Witch is an homage film to 1970s horror sexploitation films. Off the top of my head, some of my favorite films of that genre are Blood Sabbath, Satan’s Cheerleaders, and Night Hair Child. Needless to say, I’m well versed in this genre. I had high hopes going into the film. The storyline of the film being a woman who after going through a traumatic experience with her ex-boyfriend, moves to a small town and starts messing around with the men of the town with her witch powers. Sold. I’m immediately sold on the concept. That is exactly what I was expecting from this kind of film. I’m in.

One thing that The Love Witch also has going for it, is that is one hundred percent commits to the world that it is setting up, 1970s sexploitation land. The film was shot on 35mm film, and you can one-hundred percent tell. It isn’t like some 35mm films you see released today where they try to hide it using color correction and make it look almost digital-like. From the first shot of this film, you are transported into the 1970s.

The next thing that people will notice and some I can imagine would call this a negative, is the acting. Everyone in this film acts like they are straight out of a 1970s sexploitation film. The way I can see people saying this is a negative, is because the acting in 1970s sexploitation films is god awful. But that is also part of the charm, you know that you aren’t going to see Robert De Niro in one of these films, and you can laugh at the actors try their best to be taken seriously. That’s fun! So everyone in this film is god awful. I looked it up and most of the actors in this film are no name actors. So I don’t know if the actors are actually acting bad but are good actors, or if the director purposefully hired bad actors for the project. Regardless, it works.

Everything all the way down to the editing of the film is spot on to 1970s sexploitation. Going back to the first scene of the film, the font the film uses for the credits is so bad that I would probably turn a film off if it used them and wanted to be taken seriously in the modern day. But the fact that this film chooses that font, is genius. It is the exact font that someone from the 1970s would use. The transitions in the film are perfect. The superimposed parts of the film are fantastic. It really needs to be driven home how dedicated the film is to this.

Every year you get films that do this, where they pay homage to exploitation type film. Hell Tarantino has made an entire career out of it. But every single time, they never commit to it. They always make it modern in fear that it won’t connect with a modern day audience. It’s partly why I don’t like most of Tarantino’s filmography. For someone who loves these types of film and wants to make them, you sure as hell don’t show what makes them good. But this film doesn’t care about not connecting with an audience. It knows that not a lot of people are going to like it, and it goes with it. Instead of spreading everything too thin and being a forgettable film, it takes the small niche audience that will like it and hammers them. It gives that audience exactly what it wants. The director has done the research for the project. And looking at her filmography, it seems like this is what she is dedicating her life to, which good on her.

This film isn’t without flaws though. The big one, I mentioned on the podcast back when Brad reviewed it. Typically, 1970s sexploitation films are around eight minutes or less. This is because, although I love them, I can’t really sit with them for longer than that. They’re like candy, you have one every once in a while and they are fantastic. But if you eat a ton of them all the time the flavor will start to disgust you. And that is the one thing that this film does not do in terms of following the path of 1970s sexploitation. This film is two hours long. That is far too long for this kind of film. And there are certain points in this film that you could certainly cut back on to shorten the time frame. There are certain shots that last far too long. I’m not even talking story here, there are dance and stripping sequences that you could shorten. You do need them if you are going to make a sexploitation film, but you don’t need all of them to be four minutes long and you don’t need ten of them.

The second thing, at first I thought was an issue, but as the film went on and the more I thought about it, I consider it less of an issue. I don’t want to flat out say that it is a pro, but I’m considering it. The Love Witch is without a doubt a feminist film. No issues with that. But throughout the film, there is some pretty bad dialogue that is pretty down your throat about the feminist tone and themes. I’m not a fan of down your throat methods when it comes to feminism, but I know that it is a very important issue to some people and I will often just say it isn’t for me and move on. Around maybe a quarter into the film it began to bother me though because for a film that is dedicating itself to 1970s sexploitation, the dialogue and theming of the film is extremely far off from those films. So the clashing of the production design of the film and the theme of the film is what bothered me. And it bothered me for a good ten to twenty minutes of the film.

But then I realized that’s the point. While the film is paying homage to the 1970s sexploitation genre, it is also doing a massive critique of the genre. You can tell for all of the reasons stated earlier that the director doesn’t dislike the genre. It would be hard to argue that she doesn’t love the genre. But she is using the genre to flip the entire script on what those films stand for. No one would ever tell you that 1970s sexploitation films aren’t sexist. As bizarre as it is to say this, that’s part of the charm. The films revolve around a tough man being given whatever he wants by the sexy women that are around him or a poor defense group of girls being brutally murdered while naked, it is always a ridiculous premise. And this film talks about the patriarchy and sexism women face regularly. And with the dialogue that is said throughout the film, it really drives the point home of, “Oh this isn’t okay”. While giving a warm embrace to the 1970s sexploitation genre, it also points the finger at the genre. It’s kind of genius.

I absolutely loved this film. But if you have never seen or have a strong dislike for 1970s sexploitation films, stay as far away from this film as humanly possible. Like I said earlier, this is small niche audience this film is made for. And if you aren’t part of that audience, you are going to be left in the cold. But, if you are part of this audience, then congratulations of finding what would probably be one of the favorite underground films of the year.

Ep. 294: Ghost with the Most

The Reel Nerds question what makes them human when they review Ghost in the Shell.

Scroll to top