Month: December 2016

Art House Asshole : Kate Plays Christine

You know how when you’re wanting to go to the movie theater and you look up all the films that are showing and there are alway at least three that you’ve never heard of, let alone have any interest in seeing? Well, good news! I’ve seen those movies. I spend most of my theater experiences in art house theaters watching those movies that you’ve never heard of and then never watch. Yeah, I’m that hipster asshole. My goal with this is to spread information out about these films, that way you can decide one of the following. “That actually sounds pretty cool! I want to see that now!” or “Man, I’m glad I decided to go see the new superhero movie!”. So without further ado, here is my article and review of Kate Plays Christine.

I wanted to review one last documentary before the new year. So I picked this film due to its reviews and talk since it came out. And now that I finished watching the film, I’m debating if I should quickly watch another film because I’m not sure whether or not this is actually a documentary. Which is a problem for me. But let’s get into that because this is a bizarre film that I haven’t seen anything else like before.

Kate Plays Christine follows Kate Lyn Sheil an actress who has had somewhat in-and-out success in the indie/mumblecore wave of filmmakers. Kate begins preparing for her new role, playing Christine Chubbuck, a 1970s news anchor who killed herself live on television. The film follows Kate as she investigates Christine and learns as much about her as she does about herself. I’m vomiting as I write that sentence.

Many have called this film a thriller documentary as you see Kate slowly lose her mind while trying to figure out who Christine Chubbuck was. If get a glimpse into what certain actors go through to prepare for a role, and interestingly enough you see what it is like for someone like Kate Lyn Sheil who hasn’t had wide success by any means, who you could argue is desperate for success or at least desperate for a good performance. This sounds fascinating. This is something that you can read about and see stories of how certain actors prepare and whatnot. And those stories can take you down a dark road. The only problem with this film is that it REEKS of the fact that it is staged.

This film being staged is something that I’ve seen a lot of critics say is just part of the film and some people say is what makes the film interesting. And I am kind of disgusted by that. It is unclear what is real and what is fake in the film. One major thing that bothered me throughout the film is that you see Kate prepare for this role for this “soap opera feeling” movie or whatever it is, but it becomes increasingly clear that this project either doesn’t exist or exists solely for this “documentary” to see Kate’s process, I have found no sources on what this project is if it is real or if it is ever going to be released. The process that Kate is putting herself through doesn’t matter if there isn’t a project. The documentary talks to the other actors in the fake movie but if the fake movie doesn’t exist they why the hell are we talking to them?

This film came out at the same time as another film about Christine Chubbuck, Christine directed by Antonio Campos of Simon Killer and Afterschool fame. I will say that I have yet to see this film but have an interest in it due to Campos’s involvement alone. And what drew me to watching this film before that one is the fact that this is a documentary. But once it became clear to me that this wasn’t a documentary, I just felt scammed out of it. Why not make a documentary on Rebecca Hall who played Christine Chubbuck in Christine? Hall has gotten a lot of praise for her performance in that role, and I’m sure it would have been interesting to see her process. But the issue in that is that might not have fit the disgusting narrative that Robert Greene, the director of Kate Plays Christine might have wanted.

I rarely use this word seriously because I feel it is often unwarranted. But this is the most pretentious film I think I have seen all year. The narrative that Greene gives in this film not only mocks and insults Christine Chubbuck, a woman who the film has been telling her life story to the entire time in a way that made me sympathize with her. But the film also insults the audience by saying “Why do you want to see this actress portray this character?” Probably because you faked an entire god damn film to give a narrative about someone you didn’t understand or like. You can focus on the morbid curiosity of death in societies eyes. That’s fine. But don’t act like you are so god damn above it. All of the themes and morals to this film could have been put in a narrative scripted film and I would have liked that film better. But the fact that this film has the audacity to call itself a documentary when what appears to be at least seventy percent of it is staged is sickening.

I haven’t seen the rest of Robert Greene’s filmography, so I don’t know if he is immune from the “Why are you so amused by despair and death” but after this two-hour session of him masturbating on camera I will probably actively avoid watching the rest of his filmography. This film is insulting on multiple levels. Not only is it one of the worst films I’ve seen all year, this is probably one of the worst “documentaries” I’ve probably ever seen. I’ll probably do a review of Christine as well to see how that stacks up to this film. But my god, what a complete disaster.

Awards 2017 Fantasy Movie League – Week 4

*exhale* Well that was a stressful weekend. The numbers were all over the place with players trading the top spot daily as estimates rolled in. With the added difficulty of predicting how much the box office would dip on Christmas Eve and how much it would gain with a holiday Monday, and all the new releases arriving either Wednesday or Friday or expanding Sunday, you might as well have thrown a bunch of darts at a board to pick your lineup. The final PC was 1x Sing, 1x Passengers, and 6x Fences (although, according to FML, some studios still haven’t finished reporting).

Radley Cinemas picked up his first win of the season and took the overall lead from ColoRadJoe, who claims the 3rd spot this week, just ahead of Tyler Perry’s A Medea Cineplex in 4th. Movies After Ass set another lineup this week, grabbed the only BP bonus, and managed not to come in last because Doctor Acula’s Movie Funhouse didn’t set a lineup. He let last week’s lineup rollover without replacing the Sat/Sun Rogue One combo and thus, with two empty screens, grossed a mere $3,477,944. Ouch.

Next week is another 4-day box office tally, but no major releases should make Week 5 a little easier to predict.

Ep. 281: Fa La La La La La La La Land

The Reel Nerds are passengers to a city of stars when they review Passengers and La La Land.

Art House Asshole : Into the Inferno

You know how when you’re wanting to go to the movie theater and you look up all the films that are showing and there are alway at least three that you’ve never heard of, let alone have any interest in seeing? Well, good news! I’ve seen those movies. I spend most of my theater experiences in art house theaters watching those movies that you’ve never heard of and then never watch. Yeah, I’m that hipster asshole. My goal with this is to spread information out about these films, that way you can decide one of the following. “That actually sounds pretty cool! I want to see that now!” or “Man, I’m glad I decided to go see the new superhero movie!”. So without further ado, here is my article and review of Into the Inferno.

Werner Herzog is a great filmmaker. He has created a lot of great films in his lifetime. He is a very influential figure in the cinematic world. He makes a lot of films, more than the standard director. He can switch back and forth between a narrative fiction film and a documentary film very easily, which is a very difficult thing to do as a director. That being said, I just don’t get it. Almost none of his films connect with me. I know that people love this man, and I wish I did too. But there is just something about his filmography that I can’t wrap my head around. So when I critique this film, keep that in mind. If you are the kind of person that will watch a Herzog film no problem, then that’s great. But my god was this film a chore for me.

Into the Inferno follows volcanologist Clive Oppenheimer as he and Werner Herzog travel around the globe analyzing volcanos and the surrounding area of the volcano. It essentially becomes Clive and Werner traveling around the world to different places, looking at the volcanoes, talking to the people in the surrounding area about the volcano, going “wow that is a great volcano”, then moving on to the next volcano. The film is great for information if that is what you are going for. I relate this film to something you would see on the Discovery Channel or the National Geographic Channel. So if that is what you want this will be great. But it just never captured me.

This is a beautifully shot film, I will say that much. The actual footage of the volcanoes in the film are extremely beautiful. And it is something that I haven’t seen before. I don’t have much context to this film and the filmmaking process but since this is something I haven’t seen before it wouldn’t be shocking if it came out that this was a difficult shoot, or even they invented some kind of new method of filming for it or something. So if you want some extraordinary filmmaking with the volcanoes, check this film out.

There really isn’t anything wrong with the film. It isn’t like it is poorly made like I said earlier, it is a very well shot film. The subjects are all interesting, except for maybe Clive but at the same time I’m not into volcanoes so I can’t really complain. I watched this film because I would like to see more Herzog films and with this being his most recent release it would be good. But there really isn’t a story. It is just “Look at this volcano!” then “Look at this volcano!”. The only major flaw I can find with the film is that it gets pretty repetitive. Maybe that is why I was so bored. Maybe it’s because I really don’t care about volcanoes.

This review is pretty pointless.

I’m realizing as I write this that this is a pretty stupid review because I have absolutely no opinion on this film. I think it’s boring and repetitive. But since I wasted an entire page repeating this, I might as well review something in great detail. Hell, this will be one of the last reviews of the year so I might as well give you something interesting to read about.

So I decided that I’m going to write about the live action Scooby-Doo movie from 2002. This is also a film that recently entered my top ten films of all time. Why? Because it’s incredible. That’s why. Sure the studio meddled and messed with a bit of the writing, so the film wasn’t an R-rated comedy completely making fun of Scooby-Doo. But is that really what we need in a film? Do you really want to see a film mocking one of the greatest cartoons of all time? No. You think you do because you’re edgy and think you’re tough. There is a lot of subtlety in this film where you find that original drive to mock and or parody the original cartoon. While also being a lot that I loved when I was a child and saw the film in theaters. I loved this film when it was in theaters. And I love it now for completely different reasons. And if you think this film is stupid then you don’t understand pure art.

Anyway. I don’t recommend Into the Inferno. I one-hundred percent think you should give Scooby-Doo a second chance. Because it’s Christmas and Scooby needs your help.

Awards 2017 Fantasy Movie League – Week 3

I don’t know where to begin this week except with that Moana being the Best Performer was out of left field to all of us except for Movies After Ass who, finally set a lineup after however long, set at least one screen of it in his lineup. It didn’t change his fortunes, but he’s gaining ground. Meanwhile, the rest of the Reel Nerds league rested on Rogue One and whether to play a Friday screen or combine Saturday and Sunday. The Saturday/Sunday combo prevailed, flipping last week’s top three teams to the bottom and sending Doctor Acula’s Movie Funhouse to victory, yet again with Arrival in play. Playing Arrival also helped boost Detonatormonkey to second place, with Tyler Perry’s A Medea Cineplex taking third.

Overall, there’s not much separation for our teams, so each week is still anybody’s game. With Rogue One holding over predictably large numbers and releases like Sing, Passengers, and Assassin’s Creed entering the mix, it’s going to me more difficult to pick a lineup next week.

Ep. 280: Rogue Wonder

The Reel Nerds rebel when they review Rogue One: A Star Wars Story.

Art House Asshole : Under the Sun

You know how when you’re wanting to go to the movie theater and you look up all the films that are showing and there are alway at least three that you’ve never heard of, let alone have any interest in seeing? Well, good news! I’ve seen those movies. I spend most of my theater experiences in art house theaters watching those movies that you’ve never heard of and then never watch. Yeah, I’m that hipster asshole. My goal with this is to spread information out about these films, that way you can decide one of the following. “That actually sounds pretty cool! I want to see that now!” or “Man, I’m glad I decided to go see the new superhero movie!”. So without further ado, here is my article and review of Under the Sun.

North Korea is interesting for thirty minutes. This is an exaggeration, but my meaning behind this is that the state of North Korea is fascinating. But after awhile, you learn everything there is to know about North Korea. Once you understand the Korean War and the dynasty of the Supreme Leader, that’s really it. And those things are interesting, but there really hasn’t been any real developments with the country that warrant a huge expose. We know North Korea has a horrible dictatorship. We know North Koreans don’t have basic human rights. We know all of these things. So this feels kind of like a re-tread.

Under the Sun follows(?) filmmakers as they make an approved documentary for the North Korean government about a little girl living in the country. From this you see how the footage is manipulated and how they set things up to be perfect and reflect what they want you to see. There are no talking heads. There is no narration. There is nothing stereotypically “documentary” about this film. You just see a lot of uncut footage for the most part. So the film gives off more of a surreal vibe to it. You just kind of float from scene to scene. Which is really fun and interesting for the first thirty minutes. Then you get the point. And you start wondering “Geez, is this what all of the film is?”

Yes. That is what the rest of the film is.

I think it is a really interesting concept. And it isn’t even that I think it is poorly executed. I genuinely think you can’t pull this concept off. The idea of a film where you see all of the stuff that the North Korean government, or any government for that matter, wants to cut out, is an interesting one. But, you have to remember why deleted scenes exist. When you have a copy of your favorite movie and you watch the deleted scenes, you might think “Oh that was fun!” but you also realize why those scenes were cut. They didn’t add much to the film. They were fluff. They were pointless. And Under the Sun is just deleted scenes. So at the end of the day you have to ask yourself “Is a film of deleted scenes pointless?” And that question can be answered in multiple ways.

I could get past this if Under the Sun said anything new. But it doesn’t. If you know anything about North Korea, you are going to be thinking “Yeah, I know.” and “Yeah, I get it.” This isn’t some kind of mind-melting film where you are going to realize something new about the situation. This is saying everything you already know and then it just ends. To the point where I wouldn’t even say that I watched this film. It would be more accurate to say I just stared at my computer screen for two hours until this film stopped playing.

I wouldn’t recommend checking this film out. It stays far beyond it’s welcome and I can’t say that it does so with grace. If the concept sounds cool to you, maybe watch the first fifteen minutes and then decide if it captivates you to watch the rest of it. For me at least, that didn’t happen. And the North Korean Film Interest if very quickly losing its charm across the board for all film.

Art House Asshole : Silence

You know how when you’re wanting to go to the movie theater and you look up all the films that are showing and there are alway at least three that you’ve never heard of, let alone have any interest in seeing? Well, good news! I’ve seen those movies. I spend most of my theater experiences in art house theaters watching those movies that you’ve never heard of and then never watch. Yeah, I’m that hipster asshole. My goal with this is to spread information out about these films, that way you can decide one of the following. “That actually sounds pretty cool! I want to see that now!” or “Man, I’m glad I decided to go see the new superhero movie!”. So without further ado, here is my article and review of Silence.

This is a film that Martin Scorsese has been trying to make for over twenty years. He started making this film two years after The Last Temptation of Christ. This is surprising for a couple different reasons. One, upon watching this film the themes and character motivations are different from what Scorsese is known for. There is no crime, there is no anti-hero. If you were to show this film to someone who wasn’t obsessed with cinema, but someone who knew Martin Scorsese and Goodfellas and Taxi Driver and all of his other well-known films, I’m not sure if they would  be able to tell that this is a Scorsese film. I can tell, and we’ll get into that. But this is a step away from what Scorsese is known for. And that isn’t a bad thing.

Silence follows two Portuguese Priests who travel to Japan during the Shimabara Rebellion to save their mentor, who has apparently renounced God and the faith. First, let’s just get this out of the way, the film isn’t violent. This is the first instance of this being out of Scorsese’s wheelhouse. Yes, there is blood in parts, and I know that Scorsese doesn’t use hyper violence or gratuitous violence. But this film is a much more emotionally draining film. My god is this film depressing and intense. The film is essentially Christian Torture Porn. You see the main character’s faith pushed so far and the consequences for doing this. It is honestly numbing after awhile. And when there are violence and/or blood, it is used in such a way that it feels not only earned but as a final nail in a coffin. One of the deaths in the film is so moving because there isn’t any violence or blood. It just happens. And you just have to sit there and let it sink in.

The film is still Scorsese’s though. The big thing that allows you to see his vision is that camera movement. He still has his quick pans and dolly shots. To the point where I can see some people seeing it as distracting. It’s a double-edged sword. We have come so far with Scorsese that we associate those camera tricks with his fast paced action in Goodfellas and Wolf of Wall Street. It almost pulls me out when I see them in this film as the tone and subject matter is so different from his other films.

But this being a passion project for Scorsese makes sense as it is a filmmaker’s film. You can show your buddy Ralph who drives trucks for a living and has a Michael Bay film in his top ten films of all time Goodfellas and Ralph will love it. That is partly why Scorsese is so successful. He can make a fantastic film that non-film lovers can enjoy. This is a slow burning almost three-hour long film about a Priest trying to remain faithful. Ralph isn’t going to like this film. And I will tell you right now, this isn’t one of Scorsese’s best films. It is pretty middle-tier of his filmography. What I will say is that this is one of the, if not the, best shot film Scorsese has ever made. People have said that this is Scorsese’s epic. And they are right. The shots of Japan (which is actually Taiwan for budgeting reasons) are absolutely gorgeous. Every shot in this film feels like a painting from the time period this film takes place. The colors are gorgeous. The use of space is genius. I almost feel like everyone else this year shouldn’t even try, this is the best shot film this year without a doubt.

Very quickly, before we get into my problems with the film, I want to mention the sound design. I saw this with a couple of my friends and no one mentioned this to me but I want to mention it. This film sounds phenomenal. And for a film called Silence it should. I can’t recall if it had any kind of soundtrack or score outside of drums played by the characters (another Scorsese-ism that is missing), but the sound design almost carries this film. The tone is set by it. There were scenes that I felt cold because the characters felt cold and all of that is because of the sound design. So props to the sound department. My god was that amazing.

My only big issue with the film is that there is some pretty bad CGI in the film. There is one shot of them sailing to Japan that is pretty heavy CGI. And normally that wouldn’t be an issue, but for a film that shot on location for a majority of the process and looks gorgeous, that shot sticks out like a sore thumb. There is also another scene that involves a puddle that I would describe too much of to avoid spoilers, but my god is that the worst scene in the film because of the CGI in that scene. You will know what I mean once you see it. It is without a doubt the biggest problem with this film. Which isn’t big, but I rolled my eyes when that part happened.

There is also voice-over work throughout the film. The voice over is done my multiple people and multiple characters. And it is easy to get confused at parts. There were a couple different times that I thought to myself “Is this VO or is this what he is saying out loud?” and that can get confusing. And without spoiling something, there is a character at the end that has a VO that is one of the cheesier moments I’ve seen in a film this year. It is the scene where you understand why the film is called “Silence”, and I think it works for the most part. But the scene was pretty silly. Some of my friends weren’t bothered by this, so it might just be me being an asshole. But that is what I thought.

Overall, Silence is a great film that film-lovers will adore and casual movie-goers might be split on. It reminds me a lot of last years The Revenant. Some people will love it for the technicality. And others will just think it’s a waste of three hours of their life. How you decide really depends on how you look at movies. And I’m not going to tell you what you should think.

Awards 2017 Fantasy Movie League – Week 2

It was supposed to be one of the more difficult weeks to predict but two teams managed to find the Perfect Cinema. ColoRadJoe and Radley Cinemas expected the expansion of Nocturnal Animals to do well, and it did, becoming the Best Performer of the week. However, ColoRadJoe claims the official win because he finalized his lineup sooner. When approached for comment, Radley Cinemas stated, “This is bullshit!” and stormed off. Doctor Acula’s Movie Funhouse’s strategy of not changing his lineup has come to an end, down in the basement.

Next week, Rogue One pricing will be split into three separate days. Will it be better to play only Friday? Or Double up with Saturday and Sunday? It all depends on the FML pricing gods.

Ep. 279: Party Time, Xmasellent!

The Reel Nerds party like it’s Christmas when they review Office Christmas Party.

Scroll to top